Want to Be a Great Leader? Get Over Yourself

One of the facts of leadership is that the buck, ultimately, stops with you.  That’s right; when you wear the mantle of leadership you assume the ultimate responsibility of many things.  In light of this, it can be easy to hoard responsibilities and tasks, forgetting the importance of the team alongside you.  Really effective leaders, however, know that while the buck stops with them, true success requires the efforts of everyone.

In order to be the best leader you possibly can, you’ve got to remember that leaders are only recognizable as such if they have followers.  And the only way to have followers is to see yourself as one of them, even as you recognize your role as leader.  It’s a bit of a balancing act, to be sure. As a leader you need to enlist the support of your followers, asking them to help the cause in ways that maximize their individual strengths even while their help supports your vision.  In other words, you’ve got to be able to put aside the idea that you are the be-all and end-all of you mission, and recognize that the people around you are who will ultimately guarantee the success of your plan — or not.

Bottom-line:  great leaders have great followers, and enlist the support of those great followers at every turn.  Real leaders know how to set their egos aside and ask for help.  Real leaders make themselves part of the team instead of holding themselves apart.  Want to be a great leader?  Then you need to get over yourself.

Leader? Follower? Can You Be Both?

I woke up this morning with a question in my mind:  what’s the difference between a leader and a follower?  Which quickly led to another question:  can you be both a leader and a follower? For me, this blog provides a place for me to explore a bit and so, I’m going to see if I can’t sift through my thoughts to arrive at answers to these questions.

What’s the difference between a leader and a follower?  As I hold this question and mull it over, it strikes as pivotal in some respects.  What I know for sure is that being a leader is about so much more than holding a specific title.  You certainly might be a leader by virtue of the fact that you’re a CEO, founder, president, chairperson, etc;.  But the title’s not enough.  Leadership is about vision, it’s about risk-taking, it’s about showing up and standing up and playing the game even when others are dropping out.  Leaders are required to take a stand and invite others to stand alongside.  Leaders have to be willing to get it wrong, in order to get it right (whatever “it” might be).  In other words, a true leader cannot wait for the perfect idea at the perfect moment.  True leaders put themselves out there when things are less than perfect, knowing that as they move forward, step-by-step, perfection will be attained.

Followers, on the other hand, don’t need to hold a vision, they need only subscribe to another person’s vision.  Followers don’t need to risk taking the first step; instead they can follow in the footsteps of another.  Followers can pull out of the game for a bit, take a breath, and then dive back in when they’re ready.  All of this might make it sound like followers have got it far easier than leaders.  And I think that this is a bit of a misnomer.  Why?  Because as a follower, you’ve actually got to exercise a bit of gumption.  You’ve got to use your wits and ascertain whether the vision you’re subscribing to is subscription-worthy.  As a follower, your role is to lend support to your leaders, and so you’ve got to know what support is required of you in every moment.  You’ve got to be able to “read the play” so-to-speak.  The role of follower is no less difficult than the role of leader; it’s just different.

So, can someone be both a leader and a follower?  As I ask this question, a vision of flying geese comes to mind.  What I remember about geese flying in formation is that they absolutely always have a designated leader.  They also, however, have a system whereby, when the leader gets tired, the leader “steps back” and another goose takes the position of leader.  So now, the follower is the leader, and the leader follows for a bit.  In other words, while there is a definite leader and follower role to be held, when it comes right down to it which goose is the leader or follower isn’t nearly as important as all of the geese realizing that they’re on the same team, playing the same game, moving towards the same objective.

Bottom-line:  every team needs a leader, and every team needs followers to support the leader’s objectives.  More importantly, however, every team member — whether they are leader or follower — has to realize that the overriding fact is that they’re a team.  The entity of team trumps the individual roles — at least when the team is all on the same page.  So, leaders, followers, ask yourselves:  are you on the same page?  And if you’re not, how are you going to get there?